Humanity is Religion

The rules of Sustainable Humanity is Sanatan Dharma

The Ethical Dilemma - 3 Drivers of Quality Answers and propose a common Ethical code, as Human Needs are Common, irrespective to man made religions, culture or tribal norms or hypes

 When we try to answer what is good or bad, what is right or wrong, what is ethical or unethical and what is dharma or dharma, mainly three dimensions are important for evaluation:

  1. Impact on Humanity at large (relative evaluation of current gain to smaller segment than to larger segment, especially the norms set for future generation to follow and how it would unroll other behaviors and effect the peace, harmony in society)
  2. The objective needs, knowledge driven logics vs ignorance and illogic
  3. Subjective biases without much logic or knowledge.

1. The extent of implication-Scrutiny the Humanity content:

  1. What is the implication of Act, to the subjects involved? Does it help both?
  2. Does it help to a person or individuals?
  3. Does it help the local society, families?
  4. Does it help greater society, the notion it leaves for others to follow?
  5. Does it help the country?
  6. Does it help the world?
  7. Would it help the future generations to come?
  8. Would it help the humanity to develop progress, grow more or put it into danger?
  9. The notion left for society or the world to follow matters.

2. What knowledge is the driver - Scrutiny the Objective or subjective content:

  1. What is the Basic originating cause of the Act? Is it objectively driven or subjectively driven?
  2. Objective driven intent- for example a deontological argument may say- all kids should go to school, irrespective of the fact whether their parents can afford or not, it is the state responsibility and birth right of every child?
  3. Subjective driven intent- Islam prescribes ‘Women-in-Black’ and Burqua is must for all women, so that they can be protected from evil eyes of men? Why can’t men be taught to exercise self-control instead of torturing the women for their own guilt?

Recommended to read the article in detail, as attached. After reading you may agree on coclusion that Objective justifications are preferred but not essential for ethical qualification. Subjective biases often lean towards unethical periphery but not always and context matters, which can alter the face of ethical dilemma. The angle of humanity is almost essential but some time overrated against inhumanity to qualify a difficult ethical choice. A good understanding of Sanatan Dharma put logically into the analysis clarifies the ethical dilemma. The flow charts and the graphical presentation using three dimensional cubical analysis fosters a singular procedure to decide common ethical code, as the human needs are common irrespective to any manmade culture, religion, or tribal norms or hypes.
Om Tat Sat - Om, Only that is truly divine (whose reflection breeds humanity in actions)
 Om, the source of intertwined cosmic physics and metaphysics is the only truth. Rest are the morphs within (Note the science of metaphysics is not yet discovered, but as per scriptures its roots lies in behaviour, and thus derives the rules of sustainable humanity - so called Religion). May be the search of God particle, the massless property less Higgs Boson shall explain the connectivity between Physics and Metaphysics, and thus the relationship of Humanity to cycles of destruction and re-creations.